Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 2287-5824(Print)
ISSN : 2287-5832(Online)
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science Vol.37 No.3 pp.248-253
DOI : https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2017.37.3.248

Foliar application of humic acid or a mixture of catechol and vanillic acid enhanced growth and productivity of alfalfa

Laila Khaleda1, Min Gab Kim2, Jong-Rok Jeon3, Joon-Yung Cha1*, Woe-Yeon Kim1,3*
1Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center (PMBBRC), Research Institute of Life Sciences (RILS), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
2College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, PMBBRC, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
3Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Food Science & Technology, Institute of Agriculture and Life Science (IALS), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
Corresponding author: Woe-Yeon Kim, Ph.D. & Joon-Yung Cha, Ph.D. Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center (PMBBRC), Research Institute of Life Sciences (RILS), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea. +82-55-772-1968, +82-55-772-2631, kim1312@gnu.ac.kr & jycha@gnu.ac.kr
September 12, 2017 September 19, 2017 September 19, 2017

Abstract

Humic acid (HA) is known to consist of various kinds of polymeric organics, their detailed structures can vary depend on sample sources such as organic manure, composts, peat, and lignite brown coal, and largely exists in grassland soils. HA possesses diverse positive effects that not only increase plant growth but also improve soil fertility. Recently, we have manufactured a co-polymeric product of catechol and vanillic acid (CAVA) synthesized artificially, and found that CAVA as a HA mimic increases seed germination and salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. In this study, we examined whether HA or CAVA affects to seedling growth in alfalfa. Foliar application of HA or CAVA increased alfalfa seedling growth including aerial and in root parts. HA or CAVA dramatically enhanced size of leaf and root, whereas HA significantly displayed higher bioactivity than CAVA. Taken together, CAVA acts like as a HA mimic in alfalfa that could apply as an alternation supplement to enhance plant growth and productivity.


초록


    Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
    115085-2

    Ⅰ.INTRODUCTION

    A major goal of sustainable agriculture is the production and enhancement of food, fiber and other plants using farming technique. Improvement of leaf biomass for livestock feed is one of the intense research interest in forage and feed biology. Legumes improve soil fertility owing their deep-reaching root systems, accumulation into soil and rapid breakdown of root biomass (Stoddard et al., 2009; Luscher, et al., 2014; Kusvuran et al. 2014). The appropriate availability of essential nutrients in soils refers plant development and productivity (Marschner, 1986; Mengel and Kirkby, 1987). Forage legumes are important resources of protein and other nutrients which are considered as animal feed. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) has been widely cultivated on over 32 million hectares in worldwide because of its forage, nutritional value and high biomass producing quality (Fick et al., 1988; Veronesi et al., 2010; Xie et al., 2013). It has been well documented that crude protein and total digestible nutrients that plays an important role in livestock industry (Barnes et al., 1980; Hill et al., 1991).

    Humic acids (HA) are a principal component of humic substances which are the major organic constituents (Muscolo et al., 2013). Interestingly, HA largely exists in grassland soils (Stevenson, 1982). The bulk production of HA in an artificial manner has been highlighted in agronomy owing to their beneficial actions to soil, its physical and chemical properties are involved to increase crop productivity (Nikbakht et al., 2008). Toward this end, it has been demonstrated that CAVA exhibits a humic-like activity for Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) cultivated on MS agar (Cha et al., 2017). However, there are some questions still remain; (i) Can the similar HA-like activity of CAVA be re-created in soil-based plant cultivation systems? (ii) Can the beneficial action of CAVA extend to crop productivity?

    The aim of this study is to characterize the effect of the HA and CAVA on the alfalfa growth and productivity. Here, we found the foliar application of HA or CAVA increases the total biomass including fresh weight, leaf area, and root capacity of alfalfa.

    Ⅱ.MATERIALS AND METHODS

    1.Plant materials and growth conditions

    Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. var. “Vernal”) seeds were obtained from National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS, RDA, Republic of Korea). Alfalfa seeds were directly sown in the potting soil No. 2 (Farmhannong) and allowed to germinate at 23 °C under dark condition. When the cotyledon of alfalfa seedling is protruded on the soil surface, the seedlings were transferred to the 16/8 h (light/dark) cycle for growth and development.

    2.Foliar application of HA and CAVA

    HA was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Catechol (CA) and vanillic acid (VA) were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. A co-polymeric product of CA and VA (CAVA) was artificially synthesized as described previously (Cha et al., 2017). In this study, 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0)-based polymeric reactions were fully desalted with 5 kDa ultrafilter. Each powder was diluted to be a certain concentration in distilled water. To examine the seedling growth, foliar application of HA or CAVA (86 mg L-1) were carried out twice by spraying at 8 and 15 days after germination of alfalfa. Plants were harvested at 22 d after germination and measured every physiological parameter shown, such as plant height and fresh weight. Sterilized H2O sprayed to plant leaves as a control.

    3.Determination of physiological parameters

    Plants were harvested as mentioned above, and shoots and roots were divided to measure the fresh weight. Plant height was measured in intact plants grown in soil. To measure leaf area, leaves attached in 6th node were collected and measured by ImageJ software (1.48v, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij). Experiments were carried with three (for determining the aerial and root growth) or nine (for leaf area) independent replicates.

    4.Statistical analysis

    All the measurements were subjected to Student’s t-test using Microsoft Excel 2007.

    Ⅲ.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    1.HA and CAVA increase the seedling growth in alfalfa

    It has been previously reported that HA has positive effects for the development under abiotic stress responses in plants (Vaughan, 1974; Cacco and Dell Agnolla, 1984; Russo and Berlyn, 1990; Trevisan et al., 2010a). Previous study demonstrated that commercial HA as well as phenolic derivatives, CAVA (i.e. HA mimic), promotes seed germination and salt tolerance in model plant Arabidopsis (Cha et al., 2017). To examine whether HA or CAVA has the positive effects in forage crops, alfalfa was treated with foliar application of HA or CAVA. HA or CAVA were carried out twice by spraying to aerial parts of seedlings at 8 and 15 days after germination. At 22 d after germination, the seedlings treated by H2O (as a control), HA (86 mg L-1), or CAVA (86 mg L-1) were photographed, and the seedlings treated by HA showed better growth and large leaf size as shown in Fig. 1A. To prove this morphological changes by HA, we measured plant height and fresh weight (Fig. 1B and 1C). Plant height significantly increased by HA or CAVA treatment compared to H2O treatment (Fig. 1B). In addition, HA application significantly enhanced higher plant height of alfalfa seedlings than CAVA treatment. Similar to plant height, HA or CAVA application significantly displayed increase of fresh weight compared to H2O (Fig. 1C). However, no significant differences was observed between HA and CAVA. These data suggest that CAVA increases the seedling growth of alfalfa, and showed HA-like bioactivity. Sharif et al. (2006) reported that coal-derived HA increases the maize growth caused by the possible changes of soil properties. Sadiq et al. (2014) also mentioned that the application of coal-derived HA improves the soil quality and increases productivity of sunflower.

    2.HA and CAVA promote leaf expansion in alfalfa

    As shown in Fig. 1A, we observed that the leaf size was bigger in HA or CAVA treatment compared to H2O. It may cause the increase of biomass as shown in Fig. 1C. To prove these leaf phenotypes in detail, leaves at 6th node were detached and photographed as shown in Fig. 2A. Foliar application of HA or CAVA dramatically increased leaf size compared to that of H2O treatment. The leaf size was measured using ImageJ software and analyzed as shown in Fig. 2B. Similar to Fig. 2A, leaf area by HA or CAVA application was 1.7-2 fold increase compared to H2O treatment. Previous study showed that HA affects on net photosynthesis, root development, and nutrient contents in creeping bentgrass (Liu et al., 1998). Therefore, the previous studies support that the effects of HA increase the biomass of alfalfa. Again, CAVA displays a similar activity with HA for expanding the leaf size of alfalfa.

    3.HA or CAVA increase root capacity in alfalfa

    Nutrients absorption depends on root architecture and capacity in plant (Comerford et al., 1994). HA increases the root mass in several plants such as creeping bentgrass, maize, and tomato (Vaughan, 1974; Liu et al., 1998; Dobbss et al., 2007; Zandonadi et al., 2007; Trevisan et al., 2010a; Trevisan et al., 2010b). To test this increase of root capacity in alfalfa, root phenotypes were monitored after foliar application of HA and humic mimic (i.e. CAVA) at 22 d (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, we found that HA dramatically enhanced root capacity together with increase of lateral roots, and CAVA looked more lateral roots than H2O treatment. Thus, we measured root mass and the data showed that the root fresh weight of HA treatment were significantly increased that approximately five-fold higher than H2O treatment, and two-fold higher than CAVA treatment (Fig. 3B). The root mass of CAVA was also 2.5-fold higher than H2O. These data suggest that root mass is dramatically increased by HA application, and CAVA partially reenact the activity of HA increasing root capacity. The increase of root development occurred by HA application has been identified in cellular and molecular levels (Trevisan et al., 2010a). Auxin is a major phytohormone triggering lateral root development and HA displayed as an auxin-like activity (Trevisan et al., 2010b). In cellular levels, HA induced mitotic sites of lateral root emergence like as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in maize (Canellas et al., 2002; Zandonadi et al., 2007). Trevisan et al. (2010b) found that HA induces the expression of early auxin-responsive gene, IAA19. These data suggest that HA may involve in root development that revealed at cellular and molecular levels in plants.

    Ⅳ.CONCLUSION

    HA possessing a typical structures and have many functional groups that enhances plant growth and productivity, also in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Although HA markets have been increased in worldwide, the quality-control of HA should be followed due to the diversity of natural sources. Previously, we have manufactured a co-polymeric product of CA and VA (CAVA) by artificial synthesis, and found that its bioactivity enhanced seed germination and salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Here, we also found that CAVA exhibits HA-like bioactivity increasing alfalfa seedling growth including leaf expansion and root mass. These positive effects of HA or CAVA could enhance photosynthesis and nutrient uptakes, and consequently driving to increase biomass of alfalfa.

    Ⅴ.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Ⅴ.

    This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE; NRF-2016R1D1A3B03934409) and Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through Agri-Bio industry Technology Development Program funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA; Grant No. 115085-2), Republic of Korea.

    Figure

    KGFS-37-248_F1.gif
    Promotion of alfalfa seedling growth by HA or CAVA. The seedlings were grown in soil for 22 d with twice foliar application of HA or CAVA (86 mg L-1). Water (H2O) as a negative control was sprayed at the same time and method with HA or CAVA. (A) The picture taken at 22 d after germination. Plant height (B) and fresh weight (F.W.; per 3 plants) of aerial parts (C) were measured at 22 d. Data are means ± SE (n=3). Significant differences are shown as an asterisk (*P<0.05; **P<0.01; n.s., no significant differences). Abbreviations: HA, commercial humic acids; CAVA, a co-polymeric product derived from fungal laccase oxidation of catechol and vanillic acid.
    KGFS-37-248_F2.gif
    Increased leaf area by foliar application of HA or CAVA. The seedlings were grown in soil for 22 d with twice foliar application of HA or CAVA (86 mg L-1). Water (H2O) as a negative control was sprayed at the same time and method with HA or CAVA. (A) The picture of the leaves at 6th node was taken at 22 d after germination. Leaf area (B) in Fig. 2B was measured by ImageJ software. Data are means ± SE (n=9). Significant differences are shown as an asterisk (**P<0.01; ***P<0.001; n.s., no significant differences). Abbreviations: HA, commercial humic acids; CAVA, a co-polymeric product derived from fungal laccase oxidation of catechol and vanillic acid.
    KGFS-37-248_F3.gif
    Increased root capacity by foliar application of HA or CAVA. The alfalfa seedlings were grown in soil for 22 d with twice foliar application of HA or CAVA (86 mg L-1). Water (H2O) as a negative control was sprayed at the same time and method with HA or CAVA. (A) The picture of the root was taken at 22 d after germination. Fresh weight (F.W.) of roots (B) was measured at 22 d. Data are means ± SE (n=3). Significant differences are shown as an asterisk (*P<0.05; **P<0.01). Abbreviations: HA, commercial humic acids; CAVA, a co-polymeric product derived from fungal laccase oxidation of catechol and vanillic acid.

    Table

    Reference

    1. Barnes D.K. , Golen B.P. , Baylor J.E. (1980) Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement, Crop Science Society of America,
    2. Cacco G. , Dell Agnolla. G (1984) Plant growth regulator activity of soluble humic substances , Canadian Journal of Soil Science, Vol.64 ; pp.25-28
    3. Canellas L.P. , Olivares F.L. , Okorokova-Façanha A.L. , Façanha A.R. (2002) Humic acids isolated from earthworm compost enhance root elongation, lateral root emergence, and plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity in maize roots , Plant Physiol, Vol.130 ; pp.1951-1957
    4. Cha J.Y. , Kim T.W. , Choi J.H. , Jang K.S. , Khaleda L. , Kim W.Y. , Jeon J.R. (2017) Fungal laccase-catalyzed oxidation of naturally occurring phenols for enhanced germination and salt tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana: A green route for synthesizaing humic-like fertilizers , J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol.65 ; pp.1167-1177
    5. Comerford N.B. , Smethurst P.J. , Escamilla J.A. (1994) Nutrient uptake by woody root systems , N. Z. J. For. Sci, Vol.24 ; pp.195-212
    6. Fick G.W. , Holt D.A. , Lugg D.G. Hanson A.A. , Barnes D.K. , Hill R.R. (1988) Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement, ASA/CSSA/SSSA, ; pp.163-194
    7. Hill K.K. , Jarvis-Eagan N. , Halk E.L. , Krahn K.J. , Liao L.W. , Mathewson R.S. , Merlo D.J. , Nelson S.E. , Rashka K.E. , Loesch-Fries L.S. (1991) The development of virus-resistant alfalfa, Medicago sativa L , Nat. Biotechnol, Vol.9 ; pp.373-378
    8. Kusvuran A. , Ralice Y. , Saglamtimur T. (2014) Determining the biomass production Capacities of certain forage grasses and legume’s and their mixtures under Mediterranean regional conditions. Acta , Adv. Agric. Sci, Vol.2 ; pp.13-24
    9. Liu C. , Cooper R.J. , Bowman D.C. (1998) Humic acid application affects photosynthesis, root development, and nutrient content of creeping bentgrass , HortScience, Vol.33 ; pp.1023-1025
    10. Luscher A. , Mueller-Harvey I. , Soussana J.F. , Rees R.M. , Peyraud J.L. (2014) Potential of legume based grass land livestock systems in Europe: a review , Grass Forage Sci, ; pp.1-23
    11. Marschner H. (1986) H Marschner, Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, ; pp.269-340
    12. Mengel K. , Kirkby E.A. Mengel K. , Kirkby E.A. (1987) Principles of Plant Nutrition, ; pp.247-302
    13. Muscolo A. , Sidari M. , Nardi S. (2013) Humic substance: Relationship between structure and activity. Deeper information suggests univocal findings , J. Geochem. Explor, Vol.129 ; pp.57-63
    14. Nikbakht A. , Kafi M. , Babalar M. , Xia Y.P. , Luo A. , Eternadi N. (2008) Effect of humic acid on plant growth, nutrient uptake, and postharvest life of Gerbera , J. Plant Nutr, Vol.31 ; pp.2155-2167
    15. Russo R.O. , Berlyn G.P. (1990) The use of organic bio stimulants to help low input sustainable agriculture , J. Sustain. Agric, Vol.1 ; pp.19-42
    16. Sadiq S.A. , Baloch D.M. , Ahmed N. (2014) Role of coal-derived humic acid in the availability of nutrients and growth of sunflower under calcareous soil , J. Anim. Plant Sci, Vol.24 ; pp.1737-1742
    17. Sharif M. , Khattak R.A. , Sarir M.S. (2006) Effect of different levels of lignitic coal derived humic acid on growth of maize plants , Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal, Vol.33 ; pp.3567-3580
    18. Stevenson F.J. (1982) Humus chemistry, genesis, composition, reactions, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
    19. Stoddard F.L. , Hovinen S. , Kontturi M. , Lindstom K. , Nykanen A. (2009) Legumes in Finnish agriculture: history, present status and future prospects , Agric. Food Sci, Vol.18 ; pp.191-205
    20. Trevisan S. , Fracioso O. , Quaggiotti S. , Nardi S. (2010) Humic substances biological activity at the plant-soil interface , Plant Signal. Behav, ; pp.5635-5643a
    21. Trevisan S. , Pizzeghello D. , Ruperti B. , Francioso O. , Sassi A. , Palme K. , Quaggiotti S. , Nardi S. (2010) Humic substances induce lateral root formation and expression of the early auxin responsive IAA19 gene and DR5 synthetic element in Arabidopsis. , Plant Biol, Vol.12 ; pp.604-614b
    22. Vaughan D. (1974) Possible mechanism for humic acid action on cell elongation in root segments of Pisum sativum under aseptic conditions , Soil Biol. Biochem, Vol.6 ; pp.241-247
    23. Veronesi F. , Brummer E.C. , Huyghe C. Boller B. , Posselt U.K. , Veronesi F. (2010) Alfalfa. In handbook of plant breeding: Fodder crops and amenity grasses, Springer, ; pp.395-437
    24. Xie H. , Hu X. , Zhang C.R. , Chen Y.F. , Huang X. (2013) Molecular characterization of a stress related gene MsTPP in relation to somatic embryogenesis of Alfalfa , Pak. J. Bot, Vol.45 ; pp.1285-1291
    25. Zandonadi D.B. , Canellas L.P. , Façanha A.R. (2007) Indolacetic and humic acids induce lateral root development through a concerted plasmalemma and tonoplast H+ pumps activation , Planta, Vol.225 ; pp.1583-1595