Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 2287-5824(Print)
ISSN : 2287-5832(Online)
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science Vol.41 No.4 pp.280-286
DOI : https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2021.41.4.280

Effects of Charcoal Application on Ammonia Emission and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Pig Slurry in the Vegetative Growth of Maize (Zea Mays L.)

Seung Bin Lee, Sang Hyun Park, Tae Hwan Kim*
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
* Corresponding author: Tae Hwan Kim, Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Chonnam National
University, Gwangju, 61186, Korea, Tel: +82-62-530-2126, E-mail: grassl@chonnam.ac.kr
November 29, 2021 December 13, 2021 December 15, 2021

Abstract


The objective of this study was to prove the effect of pig slurry application with charcoal on nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), feed value and ammonia (NH3) emission from maize forage. The four treatments were applied: 1) non-pig slurry (only water as a control), 2) only pig slurry application (PS), 3) pig slurry application with large particle charcoal (LC), 4) pig slurry application with small particle charcoal (SC). The pig slurry was applied at a rate of 150 kg N ha-1, and the charcoal was applied at a rate of 300 kg ha-1 regardless of the size. To determine the feed value of maize, crude protein, dry matter intake, digestible dry matter, total digestible nutrient, and relative feed value were investigated. All feed value was increased by charcoal treatment compared to water and PS treatment. Also, the NUE for plant N was significantly higher in charcoal treatments (LC and SC) compared to PS treatment. On the other hand, there is no significant difference for feed value and NUE between LC and SC. The NH3 emission was significantly reduced 15.2% and 27.9% by LC and SC, respectively, compared to PS. Especially, SC significantly decreased NH3 emission by 15% compared to LC. The present study clearly showed that charcoal application exhibited positive potential in nitrogen use efficiency, feed value and reducing N losses through NH3 emission.



초록


    Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION

    The scale of livestock breeding in South Korea continues to increase as meat consumption increases. The amount of pig slurry (PS) was increased from 4,370 million tons to 4,724 million tons in 5 years (Jang et al., 2018). PS emission accounts for 38.2% of the total quantity of manure generated from livestock production (MAFRA, 2010). PS has been utilized for a long time as a fertilizer for crops and is the most important organic resource (Ndayegamiye and Côté, 1989). PS contains nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and other nutrients like unknown growth factor, and these essential nutrients can be used to grow and develop plants. However, the application of PS as fertilizer accompanies environmental problems. The application of PS has the risk of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) loss as the key important air pollutant contributing to an offensive odor, eutrophication of ecosystems, and the formation of secondary particulate matter. Also, volatilization of NH3 results in N loss during pig slurry fertilizer application on field. When NH3 is released into the atmosphere, it can react with acidic compounds to form particulate matter which can turn into a health-threatening substance (Bittman and Mikkelsen, 2009).

    Many strategies have been suggested and evaluated for mitigating NH3 emission. The NH3 in manure volatilizes when ammonium-N (NH4+-N) is converted to gas under high pH level condition. The positive effects of manure acidification have been widely studied and recently reviewed (Birkmose and Vestergaard, 2013;Park et al., 2015;Neerackal et al., 2017;Cao et al., 2020). The PS spread is a general method of application in Korea. However, the spread application of PS occurs high volatilization of NH3 from the surface of field. The injection of PS into soil efficiently prevents NH3 volatilization. Park et al. (2018) reported that injection application of PS decreased total NH3 emission by 40% compared to broadcasting application of PS. In addition, application of urease inhibitor (N-(-n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide; NBPT) that can reduce ammonia emission from urea-based fertilizer with PS has decreased from 5.0 to 12.3% of total NH3(Lasisi et al., 2020). Also, the application of zeolite with PS can reduce the NH3 emission 20%, compared to PS only (Choi et al., 2020). The zeolite is the micro-porous crystalline mineral having a regular structure of pores and extra-framework cations that are commonly exchangeable (Inglezakis and Zorpas, 2012).

    In this experiment, charcoal was used to mitigate the NH3 emission. Charcoal also has a porous structure that can accommodate a variety of cations (Subedi et al., 2015). Due to its physio-chemical characteristics, charcoal shows potential as a treatment for composting and application. Charcoal application can absorb the NH4+ resulting in reduction of N loss also charcoal itself can be used as a carbon source. Also, if the size of the charcoal is small, the surface of the capturing site is wider that can collect more NH3. Miles et al. (2020) reported that NH3 emission was reduced small size of lignite coal and biochar from broiler litter. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of charcoal application and particle size of charcoal on maize productivity and mitigating of ammonia emission from pig slurry applied maize.

    Ⅱ. Materials and Methods

    1. Experiment design

    The field experiment was conducted in at Chonnam National University, located in Gwangju, South Korea from 8th June 2021 to 23rd August 2021. The forage crops that used in this experiment was Gwang-Myeong maize for feed. The experiment was allocated with four treatments; control (non-pig slurry fertilizer, only water), PS, LC and SC. Pig slurry used in this experiment was collected from manure treatment facility (Namwon, Korea). Pig slurry was separated into solid and liquid, only liquid pig slurry was used in this study. The characteristics of pig slurry were shown in Table 1. Charcoal used in this experiment was oak charcoal collected from Yerang charcoal Co. (Yangsan, Korea). Charcoal divided into two size as large particle (3 - 6 mm) and small particle (< 3 mm).

    2. Plant growth and harvest

    Forage maize (Gwang-Myeong) was planted at 8th June in randomized complete block design with three replications; each treatment field size was 2 m × 10 m. The maize seeding was performed in lines keeping maize to maize distance 20 cm of seed spacing and 75 cm of row spacing. The pig slurry (without or with charcoal) was applied before 1 week of seedling. Pig slurry was applied in 150 kg N ha-1 and charcoal was applied in 300 kg ha-1. Harvesting of maize was conducted 76 days after seedling (23rd August). Seedling rate of maize was 25 kg ha-1. Cutting height of maize was 3 cm from the soil. 0, 14, 28 and 56 days after seedling soil samples were collected for soil nitrogen analysis.

    3. Ammonia emission sampling

    To collect ammonia emission, acid trap method was used (Ndegwa et al., 2009). Chamber size was 6 L and each chamber was connected to the 30ml tube containing 50mM sulfuric acid for trapping the ammonia. Vacuum pump was connected to the chamber to pull air through the chambers. The ammonia traps flow a rate of 0.5 L per minute for 24 h. The ammonia sampling was done at 5: 00 P.M. The sampling was continued for 51 days until the ammonia emission ends.

    4. Chemical analysis

    All harvested samples were collected and dried at 80°C for 48 hours in a dry oven for calculation of dry matter (DM) content. The dried samples were ground into powder undersize of 1.0 mm and stored at 4°C dark-dried storage room prior to analysis. The samples were analyzed for crude protein (CP) according to the methods of (Nancy et al., 2002). CP was calculated by N content according to the assumption that protein contained 16% of N (CP = 6.25 × total N). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were determined by the method of Van Soest et al. (1991). NDF was expressed free of residual ash and using heat stable α-amylase. Dry matter intake (DMI) and digestible dry matter (DDM) were calculated following equation: DMI (%) = 120 / NDF%, DDM (%) = 88.9 – (0.779 × ADF%), respectively. Also, total digestible nutrient (TDN) and relative feed value (RFV) were calculated by the equation described by Holland et al. (1990): TDN = 88.9 – 0.79 × ADF%, RFV = DDM% × DMI% / 1.29.

    Total nitrogen was determined by digestion using the Kjeldahl method. Inorganic N, such as ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen, was extracted with 2 M KCL and the NH4+-N was determined by distillation in an alkaline medium (MgO), NO3--N was reduced by Devarda’s alloy (Lee et al.,2017). Nitrogen use efficiency was calculated following equation: (plant nitrogen in pig slurry or pig slurry with charcoal applied pot – plant nitrogen in unfertilized control) / plant nitrogen in unfertilized control × 100. The concentration of NH3 in the acid trap solution was determined by colorimetrical method by using Nessler’s reagent (Krug et al., 1979) after microdiffusion in a Conway dish (Kim and Kim, 1996).

    5. Statistical analysis

    Analysis of variation was conducted to assess the effects of application on NH3 emission and feed value. To compare the means of replications between treatments, Duncan’s multiple range tests were used. Unless otherwise stated, conclusions are based on mean differences, with the significant level set at p < 0.05 by using SAS 9.1.3 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

    Ⅲ. Results and Discussion

    1. Soil nitrogen and plant nitrogen use efficiency

    The amount of total N, NH4+-N and NO3--N in soil of each treatment for 56 days are shown in Table 2. The total N in soil was gradually decreased in non-pig slurry treatment for the experiment period. However, PS with/without charcoal treatment increased the total N in soil for the first 14 days. After 14 days later, total N was decreased also in the PS treatment. Especially, PS application with charcoal significantly decreased the total N in soil compared to only PS application. Chen et al. (2010) reported that bamboo charcoal decreased Total Kjeldahl N loss from NH3 volatilization by adsorbing NH3 gas during pig manure composting. The inorganic N (NH4+-N + NO3--N) showed a similar pattern with total N. In addition, charcoal application significantly increased the plant N after harvest compared to water and PS treatment. However, there was no significant difference between charcoal size (Table 3). The NUE for plant N was increased in pig slurry with charcoal application compared to only PS. Nottfige et al. (2005) reported that the wood ash with compound fertilizer increased the maize leaf N, P and K contents. These results indicated that charcoal treatment enhanced plant N uptake.

    2. Forage yield and feed value

    Forage yield and feed value of each treatment are shown in Fig. 1. Forage DM yield was significantly higher in pig slurry and both charcoal treatment than control. Compared to non-fertilized control, DM content of PS, LC and SC treatment increased 200%, 248% and 261% (Fig. 1A). However, the DM content was not significantly different between PS and charcoal, also LC and SC. These results were consistent with the results of Ginebra et al. (2022) which reported a potential effect of biochar as a fertilizer amendment. The CP content was higher in both charcoal treatments than non-charcoal application treatments. This result related with the increased N content in soil and plant by charcoal treatment (Table 2, 3). The DMI, DDM, TDN, and RFV showed a similar tendency with CP. Husk and Major (2011) reported that NDF and ADF were decreased by 5.9% and 5.2% from biochar application, respectively. The NDF and ADF represent the compounds constituting cell membrane and low value are desired for feed value. Low ADF and NDF values result in high DMI, DDM, TDN, and RFV (Kaplan et al., 2016).

    3. Ammonia emission

    The application of PS is a great method to recycle resources, however, it emits NH3 gas and nitrogen loss. In this experiment, charcoal was effective at reducing NH3 emission. The daily NH3 emission of PS was shown in Fig. 2A. The NH3 emission has not occurred in non-PS treatment. However, the NH3 emission was highest in the PS treatment and decreased significantly in the LC and SC treatments relative to the PS. In all treatments, the NH3 emission occurred until 41 days then it was not emitted. Cumulative NH3 emission throughout the period of the experiment decreased by 15.2% and 27.9% in the LC and SC treatments, respectively, compared to the PS treatment (Fig. 2B). In addition, the cumulative NH3 emission was affected by charcoal size. The SC treatment significantly decreased cumulative NH3 emission by 15% compared to LC. Similarly, several studies have reported that the absorption of biochar or charcoal can decrease the NH3 emission. Pereira et al. (2020) reported that the addition of biochar and clinoptilolite can reduce ammonia emissions from 77 to 12%. Also, Ro et al. (2015) reported that the gas emissions by using the biochar are comparable to that of other commercial activated absorbent carbon and nature zeolite. Taken together, charcoal can reduce NH3 emission by using its physio-chemical characteristics. Also, the smaller size of charcoal more efficiently decreases the NH3 emission. The application of charcoal does not affect the quantity or feed value of maize but can be considered positively in terms of the environment.

    Ⅳ. Acknowledgments

    This study was financially supported by the National Research Foundation of South Korea (NRF-2019R1A6A3A01092319).

    Figure

    KGFS-41-4-280_F1.gif
    The yield of dry matter (DM, A), dry matter intake (DMI, B), digestible dry matter (DDM, C), crude protein (CP, D), total digestible nutrient (TDN, E) and relative feed value (RFV, F) in maize as affected by the non-pig slurry (water), only pig slurry (PS), PS with large charcoal (LC) and PS with small charcoal (SC). Data are presented as means ± SE (n=3). Different letters indicate significantly different at p < 0.05 according to the Duncan’s multiple range test.
    KGFS-41-4-280_F2.gif
    The absolute ammonia emission and cumulative ammonia emission in the soils in non-pig slurry (water), only pig slurry (PS), PS with large charcoal (LC) and PS with small charcoal (SC) applied plot for 56 days. Data are presented as means ± SE (n=3). Different letters indicate significantly different at p < 0.05 according to the Duncan’s multiple range test.

    Table

    Chemical characteristics of the pig slurry
    Changes in amount of total N, ammonium-N (NH4+-N), nitrate-N (NO3--n) and total inorganic N in the soils in non-pig slurry (water), only pig slurry (PS), PS with large charcoal (LC) and PS with small charcoal (SC) applied plot for 56 days
    Nitrogen content and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) for plant N in maize as affected by the non-pig slurry (water), only pig slurry (PS), PS with large charcoal (LC) and PS with small charcoal (SC)

    Reference

    1. Birkmose, T. and Vestergaard, A. 2013. Acidification of slurry in barns, stores and during application: Review of Danish research, trials and experience. In: Proceedings from the 15th RAMIRAN Conference, 2013 June 3-5, Versailles, France.
    2. Bittman, S. and Mikkelsen, R. 2009. Ammonia emissions from agricultural operation: Livestock. Better Crops. 93:28-31.
    3. Cao, Y. , Wang, X. , Liu, L. , Velthof, G.L. , Misselbrook, T. , Bai, Z. and Ma, L. 2020. Acidification of manure reduces gaseous emissions and nutrient losses from subsequent composting process. Journal of Environmental Management. 264:110454.
    4. Chen, Y.X. , Huang, X.D. , Han, Z.Y. , Huang, X. , Hu, B. , Shi, D.Z. and Wu, W.X. 2010. Effects of bamboo charcoal and bamboo vinegar on nitrogen conservation and heavy metals immobility during pig manure composting. Chemosphere. 78:1177-1181.
    5. Choi, A.R. , Park, S.H. and Kim, T.H. 2020. The effects of zeolite on ammonia, nitrous oxide emission, and forage yield from pig slurry applied to the forage maize cropping. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 40:274-278.
    6. Ginebra, M. , Muñoz, C. , Calvelo-Pereira, R. , Doussoulin, M. and Zagal, E. 2022. Biochar impacts on soil chemical properties, greenhouse gas emissions and forage productivity: A field experiment. Science of the Total Environment. 806:150465.
    7. Holland, C. , Kezar, W. , Kautz, W.P. , Lazowski, E.J. , Mahanna, W.C. and Reinhart, R. 1990. The pioneer forage manure: A nutritional guide. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, INC., Desmoines, 1A. pp. 1-55.
    8. Husk, B. and Major, J. 2011. Biochar commercial agriculture field trial in Québec, Canada-Year three: Effects of biochar on forage plant biomass quantity, quality of milk production. IBI. http://www.blue-leaf.ca/main-en/report_a3.php. Accessed Sep. 1, 2018.
    9. Inglezakis, V.J. and Zorpas, A.A. 2012. Handbook of natural zeolite. Bentham Science Publishers. pp. 288-316.
    10. Jang, Y.N. and Jung, M.W. 2018. Biochemical changes and biological origin of key odor compound generations in pig slurry during indoor storage periods: A pyrosequencing approach. BioMed Research International. 2018:3503658.
    11. Kaplan, M. , Baran, O. , Unlukara, A. , Kale, H. , Arslan, M. , Kara, K. , Buyukkilic, S.B. , Konca, Y. and Ulas, A. 2016. The effects of different nitrogen doses and irrigation levels on yield, nutritive value, fermentation and gas production of corn silage. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 21:101-109.
    12. Kim, T.H. and Kim, B.H. 1996. Ammonia microdiffusion and colorimetric method for determining nitrogen in plant tissues. Journal of Korean Society Grassland and Forage Science. 16:253-259.
    13. Krug, F.J. , Růžička J. and Hansen, E.H. 1979. Determination of ammonia in low concentrations with nessler’s reagent by flow injection analysis. Analyst. 104:47-54.
    14. Lasisi, A.A. , Akinremi, O.O. and Kumaragamage, D. 2020. Ammonia emission from manures treated with different rates of urease and nitrification inhibitors. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 100:198-205.
    15. Lee, S.B. , Sung, J.K. , Lee, Y.J. , Lim, J.E. , Song, Y.S. , Lee, D.B. and Hong, S.Y. 2017. Analysis of soil total nitrogen and inorganic nitrogen content for evaluating nitrogen dynamics. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer. 50:100-105.
    16. Miles, D.M. , Adeli, A. and Brooks, J.P. 2020. Lignite coal and biochar reduce ammonia emissions from broiler litter. International Journal of Poultry Science. 19:137-141.
    17. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.2013. Outcome of animal waste generation and recycling (2006-2012).
    18. Nancy, J.T. , Harold, M. , Shirley, A. and Jan-Åkei, P. 2002. Determination of crude protein in animal feed, forage, grain, and oilseeds by using block digestion with a copper catalyst and steam distillation into boric acid: Collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International. 85:309-317.
    19. Ndayegamiye, A. and Côté, D. 1989. Effect of long-term pig slurry and soild cattle manure application on soil chemical and biological properties. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 68:39-47.
    20. Ndegwa, P.M. , Vaddella, V.K. , Hristov, A.N. and Joo, H.S. 2009. Measuring concentration of ammonia in ambient air or exhaust air stream using acid traps. Journal of Environmental Quality. 38:647-653.
    21. Neerackal, G.M. , Joo, H.S. , Harrison, J.H. and Ndegwa, P.M. 2017 Manure-pH management for mitigating ammonia emissions from dairy bars and liquid manure storages. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 33:235-242.
    22. Nottfige, D.O. , Ojeniyi, S.O. and Asawalam, D.O. 2005. Comparative effect of plant residues and NPK fertilizer on nutrient status and yield of maize (Zea Mays L.) in a humid ultisol. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science. 15:1-8.
    23. Park, S.H. , Lee, B.R. and Kim, T.H. 2015. Effects of cattle manure and swine slurry acidification on ammonia emission as estimated by an acid trap system. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 35:212-216.
    24. Park, S.H. , Lee, B.R. , Jeong, K.H. and Kim, T.H. 2018. The effect of injection application of pig slurry on ammonia and nitrous oxide emission from Timothy (Phleum pretense L.) sward. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 38:145-149.
    25. Pereira, J.L.S. , Figueiredo, V. , Pinto, A.F.M.A. , Silva, M.E.F. , Brás, I. , Perdigão, A. and Wessel, D.F. 2020. Effects of biochar and clinoptilolite on composition and gaseous emissions during the storage of separated liquid fraction of pig slurry. Applied Sciences. 10:5652.
    26. Ro, K.S. , Lima, I.M. , Reddy, G.B. , Jackson, M.A. and Gao, B. 2015. Removing gaseous NH3 using biochar as an absorbent. Agriculture. 5:991-1002.
    27. Subedi, R. , Kammann, C. , Pelissetti, S. , Taupe, N. , Bertora, C. and Monaco, S. 2015. Does soil amended with biochar and hydrochar reduce ammonia emissions following the application of pig slurry? European Journal of Soil Science. 66:1044-1053.
    28. Van Soest, P.J. , Roberson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74:3583-3597.