Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 2287-5824(Print)
ISSN : 2287-5832(Online)
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science Vol.35 No.3 pp.225-231
DOI : https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2015.35.3.225

Mapping Herbage Biomass on a Hill Pasture using a Digital Camera with an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle System

Hyowon Lee1, Hyo-Jin Lee2, Jong-Sung Jung3, Han-Jong Ko1
1Department of Agriculture, Korea National Open University, Seoul 110-791, Korea,
2Department of Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea,
3National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Cheonan, 330-801, Korea
*Correspondingauthor:Hyowon Lee, Korea National Open University, Seoul 110-791, Korea, Tel: +82-2-2652-2810, Fax: +82-2-3679- 2381, E-mail: hyowon@knou.ac.kr
August 6, 2015 September 5, 2015 September 6, 2015

Abstract

Improving current pasture productivity by precision management requires practical tools to collect site specific pasture biomass data. Recent developments in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology provide cost effective and real time applications for site specific data collection. For the mapping of herbage biomass (BM) on a hill pasture, we tested a UAV system with digital cameras (visible and near-infrared (NIR) camera). The field measurements were conducted on the grazing hill pasture at Hanwoo Improvement Office, Seosan City, Chungcheongnam-do Province, Korea on May 17 and June 27, 2014. Plant samples were obtained from 28 sites. A UAV system was used to obtain aerial photos from a height of approximately 50 m (approximately 30 cm spatial resolution). Normalized digital number (DN) values of Red and NIR channels were extracted from the aerial photos and a normalized differential vegetation index using DN (NDVIdn) was calculated. The results show that the correlation coefficient between BM and NDVIdn was 0.88. For the precision management of hilly grazing pastures, UAV monitoring systems can be a quick and cost effective tool to obtain site-specific herbage BM data.


초록


    Korea National Open University

    I.INTRODUCTION

    In Korea, most pasture is cultivated on a small area and located in mountainous or hill ground, making precision management difficult. For the efficient management of Korean hill pasture, precision farming can be an appropriate pasture management strategy. Precision farming is a sitespecific agricultural management system which can reduce costs, optimize of crop yield and protect the environment (Bouma, 1997). It has a role not only in upland crop production but also in forage crop production (Suzuki et al., 2008), and precision grazing can help stock managers adjust stocking rates and determine supplement requirement (Starks et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2007).

    Site-specific pasture quality data are required for precision grassland management because pasture quality plays an important role in animal productivity and farm profitability (White and Hodgson, 1999) and the high-resolution data are required frequently for livestock management in small scale (1~20 ha) paddocks (Di Bella et al., 2004; Wallace et al., 2004). Therefore, various monitoring and analytical methods have been developed to monitor spatial distributions of pasture quality.

    However, the cost and difficulty of collecting site-specific data sets are major barriers for the application of precision grassland management (Betteridge et al., 2008). Traditional ground-based plant sampling methods are neither practical nor cost effective when a large amount of data has to be collected. Prior studies have found several factors influencing herbage biomass (BM) production (Jung, 2003; Sung et al., 2005) in hill pasture. However, most of these studies were based on block-level analysis, and the factors may vary within a field due to micrometeorology, topography and variation in soil factors. Therefore, techniques are required to measure pasture quality quickly and cost-effectively across the field.

    Remote sensing is frequently used to collect site-specific information because it can efficiently assess within-field variability in large fields (Schanda, 1978). Satellite imagery has been widely used to evaluate long-term change in pasture conditions across large areas, and it can be one of the most effective tools for displaying spatial variation in herbage conditions within fields. However, most satellite imagery has low spatial resolution (e.g. 30 m for Landsat) and the time required to collect repeat images in the same location is relatively long (e.g. every 16 days for Landsat).

    Airborne imaging has much greater flexibility than satellite platforms with a higher spatial resolution (Lamb and Brown, 2001). However, it is expensive for practical application, especially when repeated data acquisition is required. To overcome the limitations of satellite and aerial imaging, various low-altitude aerial platforms have been applied to collect high spatial resolution imagery, such as cablesupported helium balloon systems (Kawamura et al., 2011), blimps (Inoue et al., 2000) and remote-control helicopters (Sugiura et al., 2005; Rovira-M´as et al., 2005). These lowaltitude aerial platforms can provide fine-scale imagery within 1 m and are cost effective.

    For the purpose of generating a spatial distribution map of herbage BM on hill pasture, we developed a simple and cost effective low-altitude aerial platform system with a commercial digital camera on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system, collected the images and estimated the herbage BM using statistical analyses.

    II.METHODS

    1.Experimental field

    The study was conducted at the grazing hill pasture at Hanwoo Improvement Office (36° 45 N, 126° 34 E), Seosan City, Chungcheongnam-do Province, Korea (Fig. 1). This area has a mean annual temperature of 11.9℃ and mean annual precipitation of 1,285 mm. The pasture consisted of two areas, i.e. Subunit 1 (0.62 ha) and Subunit 2 (0.67 ha) which are located on a west-facing slope (145 to 190 m above sea level) with forest to the north and south of the experimental field, dominated by Quercus spp. and Pinus densiflora Siebold & Zucc., with a canopy height of 20~30 m. Both subunits were established in 1969 sown with tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea S.), orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) at 18 kg, 10 kg, 5 kg and 2 kg per hectare, respectively, in Subunit 1 and 10 kg, 18 kg, 5 kg and 2 kg per hectare, respectively, in Subunit 2 in 2013. From June 5 to June 9 in 2014, Korean native cows (Bos taurus coreanae) and their calves grazed both pastures.

    2.Unmanned aerial vehicle system with digital cameras

    To obtain aerial photos, two commercial digital cameras (Casio, FS-10) were used. A filter in front of CCD (Charge Coupled Device) on one of the digital cameras was replaced with a near-infrared (NIR) penetration filter (Fujifilm, IR 76) to obtain NIR images. Shutters on each of the cameras were controlled by signals sent by an electronic device to the two cameras at 5 second intervals (Photo 1, left hand side).

    The remote control airplane (Photo 1, right hand side) was flown to obtain digital image data from a height of approximately 50 m in the nadir position, giving approximately 30 cm spatial resolution on the ground. The airplane was 1 m long and able to lift about 300 g.

    3.Preprocessing aerial images

    NIR and RGB images from the two digital cameras were processed using Quantum GIS (QGIS) software ver. 2.6 (http://www.qgis.org/). The images were georeferenced using ground control points that were collected with the differentially corrected global positioning system (DGPS) receiver MobileMapper 120 GPS (Spectra precision Co. Ltd., Westminster, USA), giving an accuracy of less than 30 cm. Although earlier studies indicated the importance of canopy segmentation on image processing in vision-based remote sensing (Laliberte and Rango, 2011), this was not necessary in the present study as almost 100% of the ground surface was covered by vegetation.

    RGB and NIR images were resampled by 30 cm spatial resolution. Then, using the normalized digital number (DN) value of the red band (Reddn) of the RGB image and NIR band (NIRdn) of the NIR image, the normalized differential vegetation index using DN (DNVIdn) was calculated by following equation :

    DNVI dn = NR dn Red dn / NIR dn + Red dn

    4.Field data collection

    Forage was sampled in 28 plots within the field on May 16 and June 27, 2014. All vegetation was clipped to ground level using a 30 cm × 30 cm quadrat. The forage samples were dried in a forced-air oven at 65℃ for 72 h to determine the dry matter (DM) of the BM(g DM m -2).

    5.Generating spatial distribution map of pasture biomass

    Spatial distribution maps of pasture biomass were generated from the NDVIdn images. Then, a spatial distribution map of change in pasture biomass was generated from the two spatial distribution maps of pasture biomass using the QGIS software.

    III.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    1.Biomass estimation using UAV system

    The result of simple linear regression analysis between BM and NDVIdn is shown in Fig. 2. The correlation coefficient between BM and NDVIdn was 0.88.

    In this research, regression models showed relatively high predictive ability and it was similar with previous research using high-resolution satellite image and aerial hyperspectral imagery. Edirisinghe et al. (2011) reported that high-resolution satellite image shows a significant linear relationship (R2 = 0.84) between NDVI and pasture biomass. Another research using aerial hyperspectral imagery also showed a significant linear relationship (R2 = 0.81) between broad band NDVI and rangeland biomass (Beeri et al., 2007).

    However, it is generally known that NDVI is sensitive to low chlorophyll concentrations (Yoder and Waring, 1994), but is not sensitive to extremes of green vegetation with higher chlorophyll concentrations (Mutanga and Skidmore, 2004). Therefore, it is not possible to conclusively determine the effectiveness of the NDVIdn of the UAV system as the investigation was short term. However, this study has shown its potential and has laid the groundwork for the next longer term study.

    Spectral vegetation indices were calculated as a ratio or normalized difference between near infrared (NIR) and visible bands, and they have been widely used to retrieve biophysical parameters (Sellers, 1987). NDVI is the most widely known vegetation index for BM estimation (Tucker, 1979; Wessels et al., 2006) and should be calculated from reflectance. However, the DN value was directly used in this research to calculate NDVI (i.e. NDVIdn) for the convenient use of UAV system with digital camera. The results showed that NDVIdn from the UAV system with digital cameras can predict herbage biomass with high predictive ability.

    2.Generating site-specific BM data

    Spatial distribution maps of predicted BM from NDVIdn images were generated on 16th May (Fig. 3, a) and 27th June (Fig. 3, b), and spatial distribution map of BM change was generated from the generated BM maps (Fig. 3, c). Then, average BM was calculated from the spatial distribution maps of predicted BM. The average predicted BM on 17th May, 2014 and 27th June, 2014 was 668.6 g/m2 and 386.5 g/m2 in subsite 1 and 652.4 g/m2 and 447.7 g/m2 in subsite 2, respectively. The change in predicted BM was also well described BM change histogram in Fig. 4.

    For the monitoring and mapping of spatial variability, site-specific data can lead to more efficient site-specific grazing management decisions like fertilizer application, irrigation or pasture renovation (Hill et al., 1999), and it should be used to support practical information about current actual condition of Korean hill grazing pastures.

    3.Application of UAV monitoring system for monitoring hill pasture

    In Korea, hill grazing pasture is an important livestock farming resource. However, Korean hill grazing pasture is usually located on steep slope and remote from main roads, and so it is difficult to monitor pasture quality by traditional survey methods. In this research, we have confirmed that a UAV monitoring system can be a quick and cost effective tool to obtain site-specific herbage BM data presented as a very fine resolution map. The site-specific pasture herbage data from UAV monitoring system can be used not only to estimate herbage biomass and its distribution but also to apply precision grazing strategy to hill grazing pasture.

    IV.CONCLUSION

    This study investigated the potential of UAV system and digital camera for estimation of BM in hill pasture in Korea. The results show that the correlation coefficient between BM and NDVIdn was 0.88. The UAV system with digital cameras can be an effective tool to estimate hill grazing pasture BM with a high predictive ability and it may thus be a quick and cost-effective methodology.

    Figure

    KGFS-35-225_F1.gif

    Location of the study site which consisted of Subunit 1 (0.62 ha) and Subunit 2 (0.67 ha).

    KGFS-35-225_P1.gif

    Left hand photograph: digital camera for the visible image (right hand side) and near infrared image (left hand side). Right hand photograph: unmanned aerial vehicle for aerial photography.

    KGFS-35-225_F2.gif

    Relationship between normalized differential vegetation index using normalized digital number (NDVIdn) and herbage biomass (BM). *Samples were collected on 19 days before grazing and 18 days after grazing.

    KGFS-35-225_F3.gif

    Spatial distribution map of predicted herbage biomass (BM) on 19 days before grazing (a), 18 days after grazing (b) and change of biomass (c).

    KGFS-35-225_F4.gif

    Histogram of herbage biomass in subunit 1 and subunit 2 on 19 days before grazing (a) and 18 days after grazing (b) from the spatial distribution maps of predicted herbage biomass.

    Table

    Reference

    1. Beeri O , Phillips R , Hendrickson J , Frank AB , Kronberg S (2007) Estimating forage quantity and quality using aerial hyperspectral imagery for northern mixed-grass prairie , Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol.110; pp.216-225
    2. Betteridge K , Schnug E , Haneklaus S (2008) Will site specificnutrient management live up to expectation? , Agriculture and Forestry Research, Vol.58; pp.283-294
    3. Lake JV , Bock G R , Goode J A , Bouma J (1997) Precision agriculture: introduction to the spatial andtemporal variability of environmental quality , John Wiley and Sons , pp.5-17
    4. Di Bella Faivre C , Ruget R , Seguin F , Guérif M , Combal B , Weiss M , Rebella C (2004) Remote sensing capabilities to estimate pasture production in France , International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol.25; pp.5359-5372
    5. Edirisinghe A , Hill MJ , Donald GE , Hyder M (2011) International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol.32 (10) ; pp.2699-2724
    6. Hill MJ , Donald GE , Vickery PJ , Moore AD , Donnelly JR (1999) Combining satellite data with a simulation model to describe spatial variability in pasture growth at a farm scale , Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, Vol.39; pp.285-300
    7. Inoue Y , Morinaga S , Tomita A (2000) A blimp-based remote sensing system for low altitude monitoring of plant variables: A preliminary experiment for agricultural and ecological applications , International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol.21; pp.379-385
    8. Jung YK (2003) Effects of the kieserite application on the seedling vigour and yield of grass/clover mixed swards on newly reclaimed hilly soil (in Korean) , Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science, Vol.23 (1) ; pp.31-36
    9. Kawamura K , Sakuno Y , Tanaka Y , Lee HJ , Lim J , urokawa Y , Watanabe N (2011) Mapping herbage biomass and nitrogen status in an Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) field using a digital video camera with balloon system , Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, Vol.5 (1) ; pp.053562-053562
    10. Laliberte A , Rango A (2011) Image processing and classificationprocedures for analysis of sub-decimeter imagery acquired with an unmanned aircraft over arid rangelands , GIScience & Remote Sensing, Vol.48 (1) ; pp.4-23
    11. Lamb DW , Brown RB (2001) PA precision agriculture: Remote-sensing and mapping of weeds in crops , Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, Vol.78; pp.117-125
    12. Mutanga O , Skidmore AK (2004) Narrow band vegetation indices overcome the saturation problem in biomass estimation , International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol.25; pp.3999-4014
    13. Quantum GIS (QGIS) (2014) Version 2.6.1. QGIS Development Team. http://www.qgis.org,
    14. Rovira-M´as F , Zhang Q , Reid JF (2005) Creation of three-dimensional crop maps based on aerial stereoimages , Biosystems Engineering, Vol.90; pp.251-259
    15. Schanda E (1978) Remote sensing of the environment , Naturwissenschaften, Vol.65; pp.169-173
    16. Sellers PJ (1987) Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis, andtranspiration, II The role of biophysics in the linearity of their interdependence , Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol.21; pp.143-183
    17. Starks JP , Zhao D , Phillips AW , Coleman SW (2006) erbage mass, nutritive value and canopy spectral reflectance of bermudagrass pastures , Grass and Forage Science, Vol.61; pp.101-111
    18. Sugiura R , Noguchi N , Ishii K (2005) Remote-sensingtechnology for vegetation monitoring using an unmanned helicopter , Biosystems Engineering, Vol.90; pp.369-379
    19. Sung KI , Kim GS , Lee JW , Kim BW , Lee JK , Jung JW (2005) Effects of cutting frequency and level of fertilizer application on forage productivity at alpine grassland of 600 maltitude (in Korean) , Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science, Vol.25 (2) ; pp. 137-142
    20. Suzuki Y , Tanaka K , Kato W , Okamoto H , Kataoka T , Shimada H , Sugiura T , Shima E (2008) Field mapping of chemical composition of forage using hyperspectral imaging in a grass meadow , Grassland Science, Vol.54; pp.179-188
    21. Tucker JC (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combination for monitoring vegetation , Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol.8; pp.127-150
    22. Wallace JF , Caccetta PA , Kiiveri HT (2004) Recentdevelopments in analysis of spatial and temporal data for landscape qualities and monitoring , Austral Ecology, Vol.29; pp.100-107
    23. Wessels KJ , Prince SD , Zambatis N , Macfadyen S , Frost PE , Van Zyl D (2006) Relationship between herbaceous biomass and 1-km2 Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer(AVHRR) NDVI in Kruger National Park, South Africa , International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol.27; pp.951-973
    24. White J , Hodgson J (1999) New Zealand pasture and cropscience , Oxford University Press Auckland,
    25. Yoder BJ , Waring RH (1994) The normalized difference vegetation index of small Douglas-fir canopies with varying chlorophyll concentrations , Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol.49; pp.81-91
    26. Zhao D , Starks PJ , Brown MA , Phillips WA , Coleman SW (2007) Assessment of forage biomass and quality parameters of bermudagrass using proximal sensing of pasture canopy reflectance , Grassland Science, Vol.53; pp.39-49