ISSN : 2287-5832(Online)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2013.33.1.39
A Nutritional Evaluation on Whole Cottonseed Removed Germination Ability by Heat-treatment
Abstract
- (7)2013-4159(손용석)(최종).pdf567.7KB
Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
Whole cottonseed (WCS) is a popular feedstuff used for dairy cows due to its high fiber, high energy and high protein content (Bernard et al., 1999). In a nationwide survey to determine the feedstuffs fed to lactating dairy cows, it was reported that approximately 40% of dairy producers in the United States fed WCS (Mowrey and Spain, 1999). WCS is one of the major component feeds used for TMR in Korea. Recently genetic modifications have produced cotton plants more resistant to pests and tolerant to herbicides (Bertrand et al., 2005). On the other side, like Korean circumstances, wide spread use of whole cottonseed, which is mostly genetically modified organism (GMO) plant imported from foreign countries and being fed to animals as raw state, arouses worries that it may disturb existing ecology of the country unless dispersion of the seed is under proper control. Even a piece of the seed within the excreta does not lose its ability of germination, which would occasionally come in sight on the farmstead.
One of the potential processing methods to remove germination ability of the seed would be heat treatment. Generally accepted heating temperature to get rid of germination ability for hard seed plant species is presumably about more than 70℃, since Beena and Jayaram (2010) found that the seeds of soybean and green pea withstood high temperature up to 70℃ for 10 days even if high temperature treatment reduced the rate of germination.
On the other hand, heat treatment on the feed has long been an important processing method to improve its nutritive values; for instance, heat processing is the most used treatment in North America to decrease microbial degradability of feed protein in the ruminant (National Research Council, 2001). Various heat treatments have been used to decrease the solubility of crude protein and increase the rumen undegradable protein (RUP) fraction of different feedstuffs by blocking reactive sites for microbial proteolytic enzymes (Mabjeesh et al., 2000). WCS is relatively high in N, being used to supply an important portion of the dietary N required by dairy cows (Pires et al., 1997). Several studies on various protein sources have shown a correlation between increased milk production and decreased ruminal degradation of protein (Faldet and Satter, 1991; Sahlu et al., 1984). Heat treatment of WCS increased the amount of ruminally undegradable protein (Pena et al., 1986), however, the effect seemed highly dependent upon the level of heat input (Pires et al., 1997).
The study was therefore conducted to elucidate the effects of heat treatment on changes in various nutritive parameters under effective condition for removing germination ability of WCS.
Ⅱ. MATERIALS AND METHODS
The experiment was conducted after the protocol was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee(No. KUIACUC 20110511-2).
1. Treatment of whole cottonseed
Linted whole cottonseed (WCS) was purchased from KOREA SILO, Co., Ltd (Incheon, Korea), and heated using mechanical circulation oven (VS-1202D9, Vision Scientific Co., Bucheon, Korea) at 76, 78, 80, 85, 100℃ for 30min, respectively.
2. Chemical analysis
Shortly after drying both raw seeds (RWCS) and heated ones (HWCS) were ground in 2 steps, firstly using a disc mill (McCoy Corporation, BM-D-100, TX, USA) and secondly a laboratory centrifuge mill (Shinmyung BT, SMBT 3000, Daejeon, Korea). The stepwise grinding procedure was a useful preventive of segregation between the seed and the lint, enabling us to obtain homogeneous samples for chemical analysis as well as in vitro trial for digestibility. Samples were analyzed for DM, CP and lipid by AOAC procedures (AOAC, 1995). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were determined using an ANKOM200 Fiber Analyzer (ANKOM Technology, NY, USA). Fatty acid composition were examined by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) using a HP-6890GC instrument (Hewlett-Packard, CA, USA) with a FID and a HP-FFAP column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm). The oven temperature conditions were as follows: the initial temperature of the column, 100℃, was held for 2min, after which the temperature was stepped up by 4℃/min to 240℃, where it was held for 20 min. The flow rate of the carrier gas (helium) flow rate was 1.5 mL/min. Fatty acids were identified by comparing the relative retention times of FAME peaks with those of standards. Total amino acid composition was determined with an amino acid analyzer (Biochrom 20, Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, England). Samples were hydrolyzed in 6NHCl in evacuated sealed tubes at 110℃ for 24 h. The hydrolysates were evaporated to dryness in a vacuum evaporator and then diluted with sodium citrate buffer for analyzing amino acid.
3. Germination test
After sterilization of whole cotton seeds according to the procedure of Sato et al. (2005), three replicates of 30 seeds each of control and heat-treated were placed in sterilized Petri dishes and covered with lid plates which also lined with moistened filter paper. Petri dishes were watered as required to replace evaporation losses.
4. In vitro digestibility
Fresh rumen content from two ruminally-cannulated Holstein cows was collected 3h after morning feeding for use in the cultures. Approximately 1.5 L rumen fluid was collected by straining the digesta through four layers of cheesecloth into a flask flushed previously with CO2. In this trial, 0.5 g of each sample was placed in to 50 mL tubes, the incubation inoculum was prepared by diluting the inoculum with McDougall’s buffer (McDougall, 1947) and fresh rumen liquor in a 1:4 (v·v-1 ) ratio and stirring in a water bath at 39°C with purging CO2 until its use (10-15 min later). The inoculated test tubes were allocated in shaking incubator at 39℃ for 48 h. After incubation, the tubes were kept in ice and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min and the supernatant was discarded. Samples were subjected to either a 48 h pepsin-HCl digestion as described by Tilley and Terry (1963). The residue remaining after drying was used to calculate the in vitro dry matter digestibility.
5. In situ study
Two ruminally cannulated Holstein heifers were used to determine in situ dry matter and protein degradability of both WCSs. The animals were maintained on a standard diet as TMR having a forage to concentrate ratio of 7 to 3.
WCS samples (3.5 g) were weighed in to 5 × 10 cm nitrogen-free polyester bags (ANKOM Technology, NY, USA) with a 50 μm mean pore size. Before placement in the rumen, the bags (n=24) were soaked briefly in water, and then introduced serially into the rumen and suspended for 2, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 h in four replicates for each incubation time. Solubility at 0 h was evaluated by immersing the bags in warm water (39℃). At the end of each incubation time, the bags were removed from the rumen and rinsed thoroughly with cold tab water until rinsing water became colorless. Bags then were placed in a forced air oven set at 60℃ for 48 h. The residue was analyzed for dry matter by drying oven (60℃/48 h), and nitrogen content by micro-Kjeldahl method.
6. Statistical analysis
Statistical significant differences of means at p<0.05 were calculated using one-way ANOVA indicated by different letters above bars.
Ⅲ. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
When WCS were subjected to heat treatment at 76, 78 and 80℃ for 30 min, the germination rate was significantly decreased (Fig. 1). But complete elimination of germination ability was attained when we applied the temperature as high as 85℃ or 100℃ for the same duration. In the study of Beena Anto et al. (2010) could observed a reduction in the germination percentage of pea and soybean to 10% and 17%, respectively, when they increased the temperature up to 70℃. The heating level of 85℃ for 30 min used in this experiment may be economically highest one to attain a complete removal of germination ability for WCS. Drying at high temperature leads to significant reduction of moisture content and concomitant loss of viability in seeds (Meng et al., 2003). Therefore, based on the optimal temperature condition (85℃, 30 min) we tried to examine the changes of various nutritional parameters including nutrient composition, in vitro digestibilities and ruminal protein degradabilities, comparing between raw (RWCS) and heated (HWCS).
Fig. 1. Effect of heat treatment on germination of whole cottonseed (WCS). WCS was heated by mechanical circulation oven at 76, 78, 80, 85, 100℃ for 30min, respectively, with intact one as Control. a,b Values with different letters above each bar are significantly different (p<0.05) among different treatments.
No significant differences were found in proximate analysis of nutrient contents between RWCS and HWCS (p>0.05) (Table 1). Fat (EE) contents were quite similar to those reported by Bertrand et al. (2005). Minor differences observed in the composition of whole cottonseed may be due in part to size of the seed, lint content of the hull and weather conditions (e.g. average rainfall and temperature). Table 2 shows a comparison of amino acid contents between RWCS and HWCS. Changes in some amino acid content were observed by heat treatment; i.e. higher levels of glutamic acid, glycine, histidine and threonine and lower levels of methionine and leucine were obtained in HWCS as compared to RWCS (p<0.05). Other amino acids existed in similar contents for both kinds. The differences, however, seemed not to be associated with heat treatment but the partly to reflect some variation originated from different sampling lot and also the variation that might come from different environmental factors affecting plant quality and seed morphology during vegetation period (Van Soest, 1994). As for fatty acid composition, no significant differences were observed by the heat treatment (Table 3). Linoleic acid (C18:2) was consistently present in the highest quantity averaged 56% of the total fatty acid. The fatty acid in next highest quantity was palmitic acid (C16:0 ) showing 23% on the average, followed by oleic acid (C18:1 ) averaged 16%. Those three major fatty acids existing in WCS were also reported by Bertrand et al. (2005) and Berberich et al.(1996).
Table 1. Chemical composition of raw whole cottonseed (RWCS) and heat‐treated whole cottonseed (HWCS)
Table 2. Amino acid contents of raw whole cottonseed (RWCS) and heat-treated whole cottonseed (HWCS)
Table 3. Fatty acid composition of raw whole cottonseed (RWCS) and heat-treated whole cottonseed (HWCS)
Table 4. In vitro digestibility of raw whole cottonseed (RWCS) and heat-treated whole cottonseed (HWCS)
In a study on the nutritional effect of heating whole soybean Faldet et al. (1991) found that longer heating time resulted in more complete protection of feed protein by accelerating Maillard reaction. The effect of heat-treatment of whole linted cottonseed on OM digestibility has been inconsistent among authors. Heat-treatment of cottonseeds has either not affected OM digestibility (Pena et al., 1986) or decreased it (Pires et al., 1997). The decrease in nutrient solubility and degradability of roasted WCS may accelerate the passage of fiber of WCS origin to the abomasum (Mabjeesh et al., 2000). Heat treatment of WCS by roasting at relatively high temperature of 149℃ increased the amount of ruminally undegradable protein from 30.4 to 34.2%(Pires, 1997). Since main objective of heat treatment in this study was to eliminate germination ability, optimal heating temperature should be as lowest as possible considering its economic efficiency. Although heating level applied in the study was much lower than that used by other authors above mentioned, WCS heated at 85℃ for 30 min in the oven caused a significantly (p<0.05) lowered rumen degradability both in DM and CP as compared with raw WCS (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). On the average, increase of protein degradability for more than 10% unit was obtained for heated WCS during the incubation within the rumen.
Fig. 2.In situ ruminal dry matter degradability for raw whole cottonseed (RWCS) and heat-treated whole cottonseed (HWCS). * Mean values at each time were significantly different at p<0.05.
Fig. 3.In situ protein degradability for raw whole cottonseed (RWCS) and heat‐treated whole cottonseed (HWCS).* Mean values at each time were significantly different at p<0.05.* Mean values at each time were significantly different at p<0.05.
As seen in Table 5, relatively higher fraction B obtained from the in situ incubation to other ones reported (Pires et al., 1997; NRC, 2001) might be due to the 2 step fine grinding of WCS for sample preparation. Pires et al. (1997) observed a decrease of protein degradability by 3.8% unit from WCS roasted at 149℃ with steeping. In this study, heating WCS at 85℃ for 30min in the oven similarly lowered its RDP content by 3.3% unit.
Table 5. Fractions and degradation of protein in situ from raw whole cottonseed (RWCS) and heattreated whole cottonseed (HWCS)
Ⅳ. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, results obtained in the study indicate that heating condition used in this study, which was proved to be most appropriate and economic one to remove germination ability of WCS, may also improve nutritive value for the ruminant with regard to the protection of protein in the cotton seed.
Ⅴ. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by Agenda Program (No. PJ907080) of National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.
Reference
2.Beena Anto, K. and Jayaram, K.M. 2010. Effect of temperature treatment on seed water content and viability of green pea (Pisum sativum L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) seeds. International Journal of Botany. 6:122-126.
3.Berberich, S.A., Ream, J.E., Jackson, T.L., Wood, R., Stipanovic, R., Harvey, P., Patzer, S. and Fuchs, R.L. 1996. The composition of insect-protected cottonseed is equivalent to that of conventional cottonseed. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 44:365- 371.
4.Bernard, J.K., Calhoun, M.C. and Martin, S.A. 1999. Effect of coating whole cottonseed on performance of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 82:1296-1304.
5.Bertrand, J.A., Sudduth, T.Q., Condon, A., Jenkins, T.C. and Calhoun, M.C. 2005. Nutrient content of whole cottonseed. Journal of Dairy Science. 88:1470-1477.
6.Faldet, M.A., Son, Y.S. and Satter, L.D. 1992. Chemical, in vitro, and in vivo evaluation of soybeans heat-treated by various processing methods. Journal of Dairy Science. 75:789-795.
7.Mabjeesh, S.J., Galindez, J., Kroll, O. and Arieli, A. 2000. The effect of roasting nonlinted whole cottonseed on milk production by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 83:2557-2563.
8.McDougall, E.I. 1947. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. Biochemical Journal Vol. 43, No.1;99-109.
9.Meng, S.C., Zhang, H.Y. and Kong, X.H. 2003. Effect of dry-heat treatment at 76℃ in different times and moisture content on seed vigour of Xin-Li-Mci radish. Seed Science and Technology. 31:193-197.
10.Mowrey, A. and Spain, J.N. 1999. Results of a nationwide survey to determine feedstuffs fed to lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 82:445-451.
11.National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
12.National Research Council. 1985. Ruminant Nitrogen Usage. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
13.Pena, F., Tagari, H. and Satter, L.D. 1986. The effect of heat treatment of whole cottonseed on site and extent of protein digestion in dairy cow. Journal of Animal Science. 62:1423-1433.
14.Pires, A.V., Eastridge, M.L. and Firkins, J.L. 1997. Effects of heat treatment and physical processing of cottonseed on nutrient digestibility and production performance by lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 80:1685-1694.
15.Sahlu, T., Schingoethe, D.J. and Clark, A.K. 1984. Lactational and chemical evaluation of soybean meals heat-treated by two methods. Journal of Dairy Science. 67:1725-1738.
16.Sato, D., Aymani, A., Yasutomo, T. and Koichi, Y. 2005. Confirmation and quantification of strigolactones, germination stimulants for root parasitic plants Striga and Qrobanche, produced bycotton. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 69:98-102.
17.Tilley, J.M.A. and Terry, R.A. 1963. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society. 18:104-111.
18.Van Soest, P.J. 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd Ed. Cornell University Press.