ISSN : 2287-5832(Online)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.2.101
유채 품종별 황 공급수준이 황산염 동화에 미치는 영향
Effect of Sulfate Supply Level on Sulfate Assimilation in Different Oilseed Rape Cultivars
Abstract
- GCJHBG_2012_v32n2_101.pdf642.6KB
Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
Sulfur (S) is an essential element for plant growth. In higher plants, S enters the plant mainly via the roots from soil solution as the form of SO42-. Then it is transported through the xylem to leaves, delivered to cells and stored in the vacuole or transferred into chloroplasts, where it is activated by adenylation to adenosine-5´-phopsphosulfate, catalyzed by ATP sulfurylase, the first enzyme of sulfate assimilation (Herschbach and Rennenberg, 1991). As Clarkson et al. (1983) and Bell et al. (1995) suggested that SO42- is only released from vacuoles of mesophyll cells when plant exposed to a prolonged S stress and this process is too slow to support new growth. Thus, the first symptoms are exhibited in developing leaves when plant grown in minus S nutrient (Blake-Kalff et al., 1998).
In plant, the proportion of S only ranges from 0.1 to 1.5% of dry weight (Ahmad et al., 2005). However, it plays a critical role in catalytic or electrochemical function in cells (Saito, 2004). For instance, S is essential for amino acids (Cys and Met), oligopeptides (glutathione), as well as vitamins and some cofactors (Leustek, 2002). Glutathione (GSH) is the most abundant nonprotein thiol in many organisms (Noctor et al., 2002). And it has been suggested that GSH is the main form of reduced sulfur transported from shoot to root (Herschbach et al., 2000). In addition, the investigation using ‘split-root’ method was evident that GSH acted as a negative signal for sulfate uptake, and it is also important for defense against various stressed conditions, including oxidative stress caused by active oxygen species, xenobiotics or some heavy metals (Lappartient et al., 1999; Ruiz and Blumwald, 2002).
Rape species (Brassica napus L.) are particularly sensitive to S deficiency as it has a high demand for S (Holmes, 1980). Zhao et al. (1997) demonstrated that a large quantity of Scontaining amino acids is required for production of seeds. However, with the decrease of sulfur from industrialized areas, S deficiency in agricultural soils has been occurred in the past few years (Scherer, 2001). In some European countries S has become one of the most limiting nutrients in agricultural production (Eriksen et al., 2004). In North America, S deficiency was also observed in some agricultural species (Legge and Krupa, 2002). On the other hand, the application of mineral fertilizer is not always the ideal solution when considering the influence of agronomic, environmental and economic factors (Aulakh, 2003). Therefore, the identification of S-efficient rape genotype is necessary. The demand of S generally varies with different rape cultivars, which reflect the capability of S uptake and their assimilation at the whole plant level. However, to our knowledge, relatively little information has been available on the sulfur utilization among various oilseed rape cultivars, especially when sulfur nutrition is limited.
In present study, we hypothesize that under S-deficiency conditions the oilseed rape cultivars respond differently to sulfate supply level for the assimilation of sulfate taken up. To test this hypothesis, the activity of ATPs and GSH content were analyzed in ten different cultivars of rape plants grown under S-sufficient or S-limited conditions.
Ⅱ. MATERIALS AND METHODS
1. Plant culture and treatment
Seeds of rape (Brassica napus L.) were surfacesterilized by a consecutive washing with Tween 20 and 80% ethanol (Kim et al., 1991). And then they were germinated in bed soil. When seedlings were grown to the 3-leaf stage, they were transferred to 2.3 L pots filled with 2 L of complete nutrient solution containing 0.5 mM KH2PO4, 0.5 mM K2HPO4, 0.5 mM MgSO4, 1.0 mM NH4NO3, 1.5 mM K2SO4, 1.5 mM CaCl2 · 2H2O, 0.2 mM Fe · Na · EDTA and mixed microelements. The nutrient solution was changed every 5 days to minimize pH shift and nutrient depletion. These plants were cultivated in a greenhouse with a day/night mean temperature of 27/20℃, and a relative humidity of 65/80%. In addition to natural light, supplemental light was given by metal halide lamps which generated approximately 400 μM photons m-2s-1 at the canopy height for 16 h per day.
Eight-week-old plants with good uniformity were selected for the treatment of different SO42- supply levels. Two levels (0.2 mM and 2.0 mM) of SO42- were supplied by modifying the concentration of SO42- source in nutrient solution using MgCl2 to substitute for MgSO4 to bring S-deficient conditions. Plants were harvested after 3-day treatment. Each plant was separated into old leaves, middle leaves, young leaves and roots. Leaves were separated by the order of ontogenic appearance, which was designated as leaf number (i.e. giving leaf No. 1 for the oldest leaf). In this study, the leaf ranks numbered 4 and 5 were considered as mature leaves, and up to 8 as young leaves. The leaf samples were immediately frozen in liquid N2 and stored in deep freezer for further analysis.
2. Sulfate uptake
Sulfate uptake was estimated by depletion method, which determined the reduced concentration of specific ion in the complete nutrient solution. Nutrient concentration in the solution was measured at a series of different time intervals. The difference between initial and final amounts of nutrient was attributed to root uptake. In present study, sampling of nutrient solution was carried out when each treatment was applied, and consecutively every day. Nutrient solution was filtered through a 25 μM syringe filter. The concentration of sulfate in sample solution was determined by ion exchange chromatography (Dionex, DX-120; USA), using an isocratic Na2CO3 / NaHCO3 eluent (1.8 mM/ 1.7 mM), and flow rate 2.3 mL min-1. A sample volume of 25 μL was injected via an auto injector (AS40 Automated Sampler) into an IonPac AS4A-SC guard column and IonPac AS4A-SC analytical columns, coupled to an ASRS ULTRA II (4 mm) Anion Self- Regenerating.
3. ATP sulfurylase
About 0.2 g fresh leaves were rapidly ground at 4℃ in a buffer consisting of 10 mM Na2 EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 2 mM DTT and 0.01% insoluble PVP, using a 1:4 (w/v) tissue to buffer ratio. The homogenate was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4℃. The resulting supernatant was used for ATP sulfurylase assays. ATP sulfurylase activity was measured using molybdate-dependent formation of pyrophosphate, as described by Lappartient and Touraine (1996). The reaction was initiated by adding 200 μL of crude extract to 1 mL of the reaction mixture, which contained 7 mM MgCl2, 5 mM Na2MoO4, 2 mM Na2ATP, and 1unit of sulfate-free inorganic pyrophosphatase (Sigma, USA) 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0). Another aliquot from the same extract was added to the same reaction mixture without Na2MoO4. After incubation at 37℃ for 15 min, 1 mL of 10% TCA (TCA/acetone, w/v) was added to stop reaction and was centrifuged (13,000 rpm for 15 min), 1 mL supernatant was mixed with 1 mL color reagent solution (2.5% ammonium molybdate and 0.125% ammonium metavanadate), and then incubation at 35℃ for 30 min was followed. The absorbance was immediately measured at 420 nm. ATP sulfurylase activity was calculated from a standard curve obtained from known concentrations of PO43-. One unit of ATP sulfurylase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that liberated 1 nmol of PO43- per min.
4. Glutathione determination
For the measurement of GSH concentration in leaves, 0.2 g fresh tissue was extracted by 1.0 mL 5% 5-sulfosalicylic acid. 900 μL reaction mixtures contained 143 mM Na-PO4 buffer (pH 7.5), 6.3 mM Na2EDTA, 0.67 mM 5, 5-Dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) and 0.22 mM NADP+. Reaction of 100 μL extraction was initiated by adding 10 μL glutathione reductase. Changes in absorbance at 412 nm during 2 min were measured. Standard curve which was made with several different concentrations of GSH was used.
5. Statistical Analysis
A completely-randomized design was used with three replicates. An individual pot containing three plants represented a replicate. Duncan’s multiple range tests were used to compare the means of separate replicates. Unless otherwise stated, statistical significance was postulated for p=0.05.
Ⅲ. RESULTS
1. ATP sulfurylase activity in response to S-deficiency
Under complete SO42- (2.0 mM) conditions, ATP sulfurylase activity was variable in young leaves, representing a range from 81.9 (Tamra) to 123.5 U·g-1 fresh weight (FW) (Naehan) (Table 1), which was higher than that of old leaves except in pollen. In contrast, the activity dramatically decreased by 3 days S-deficient (0.2 mM SO42-) treatment both in young and old leaves, but the decreasing ratio was higher in old ones. Under S-deficient conditions, the lowest activity of ATP sulfurylase was observed in young and old leaves of Naehan, with a decrease of 61.5% and 68.2% compared to the control, respectively.
Table 1. Changes in ATP sulfurylase activity in young and old leaves of ten cultivars
2. Relationship between ATP sulfurylase activity and SO42- uptake
To estimate the relationship between ATP sulfurylase activity and SO42- uptake among different cultivars of rape under S-deficient conditions, scatter plots were used (Fig. 1). Under S-limited conditions (0.2 mM SO42-), ATPs activities were variable among cultivars, ranging from 47.5 to 73.8 U·g-1 FW in young leaves, and from 28.2 to 42.3 U·g-1 FW in old leaves. The results obtained clearly showed that the activity of ATP sulfurylase was various in different age of leaves. The comparison, within the same cultivar a higher ATPs activity was observed in young leaves than in old leaves. In young leaves, the lowest ATP sulfurylase was observed in Naehan. In old leaves, the relationship between two physiological parameters was well correlated, whereas the consistency was weaker in young leaves. Simultaneously, Saturnin and Youngsan having high SO42- uptake were at medium ATPs activity level in young leaves, but in old leaves the activities were higher than others.
Fig. 1. Correlations exist between ATP sulfurylase and SO42- uptake either in young or in old leaves of rape plants under S-limited conditions. Mo, Mosa; Ca, Capital; S, Saturnin; A, Akela; P, Pollen; Mk, Mokpo; Y, Youngsan; T, Tamra; Co, Colosse; N, Naehan. Leaf samples derived from 8-week-old pants which were exposed to S-deficient medium for 3 days before harvest. The values are means ± SD (n=3).
3. Glutathione concentration
S deficiency resulted in a significant (p<0.05) increase in GSH concentration extracted from young leaves of all cultivars, representing a range from 247.6 (Mokpo) to 416.1 nmol g-1 (Mosa) (Fig. 2). And the highest rate of increase in GSH concentration was found in Akela (63%), followed by Saturnin (59%) and Mosa (53%). In old leaves, GSH concentration was less affected by S-deficient treatment. However, a significant (p<0.05) decrease was observed in Akela (-79%), Pollen (-72%), Saturnin (-70%).
Fig. 2. Effects of different SO42- supply level on glutathione (GSH) concentration in young and old leaves. Leaf samples derived from 8-week-old pants which were exposed to Sdeficient medium for 3 days before harvest. The values are means ±SD (n=3).
Ⅳ. DISCUSSION
ATP sulfurylase activity decreased in all ten cultivars after S-deficient application either in young or old leaves (Table 1). Previous study has been reported that ATP sulfurylase activity was reduced in response to S starvation (Logan et al., 1996). However, in roots the S supply status has an adverse effect on ATPs activity, as demonstrated by Lappartient and Touraine (1996), they found that the activity of ATP sulfurylase extracted from roots of intact canola (Brassica napus L. cv Drakkar) increased after withdrawal of S source from the nutrient solution. Under limited S conditions, the activity of ATP sulfurylase was higher in young leaves than that of old leaves, which is consistent with previous findings (Adams and Rinne, 1969). Previous study (Abdallah et al., 2010) showed that in S-deficient rape plant 65% of S absorbed was found in roots; only approximate 23% was in leaves, which suggested that root might function as sulfur source when exogenous S was restricted. The results obtained showed a clear difference in the activity of ATP sulfurylase among various rape cultivars, which suggesting that rape cultivars differ in their capacity to utilize sulfate under limited S conditions. The relationship between two physiological parameters is well consistent with the response of ATP sulfurylase to SO42- uptake; it might be due to uptake and assimilation of sulfate regulated in response to sulfate demand which varies in different cultivars. Under S-deficient conditions, a higher ATPs activity was observed in young leaves than in old leaves, consistent with previous findings (Li et al., 2009), indicating the active of sulfate assimilation located in young tissue rather than in old tissue.
It is well known that GSH is an antioxidant, and it is widely used as a marker of oxidative stress and as a storage and transport form of reduced sulfur (Tausz et al., 2004). In young leaves, S deficiency (0.2 mM SO42-) significantly increased GSH concentration in all cultivars (Fig. 2) which is in agreement with the study of Hartmann et al. (2004) and Rennenberg (1984), they suggested that the accumulation of GSH was partly due to the exportation from matured leaves. However, Smith and Lang (1988) pointed out that over 90% of S transported out of the soybean mature leaves was recovered as SO42-, and the export of GSH derived from mature leaves was negligible. Considering the young leaves are more susceptible to S deficiency, the increased GSH may contribute to defense against the negative effect from limited S nutrient.
Taken together, present study revealed that sulfate uptake and assimilation vary within different rape cultivars. The results may also give insight in the quality of cultivars, which can supply a strategy for further use in agricultural fields where the sulfur availability is limited.
Ⅴ. ABSTRACT
To determine sulfate uptake and assimilation of various rape cultivars (Brassica napus L.) under different S levels, the activity of ATP sulfurylase, SO42- uptake and glutathione (GSH) concentrations were measured in different age of leaves. In this study, ten rape cultivars (Mokpo, Tamra, Youngsan, Naehan, Saturnin, Akela, Mosa, Capitol, Pollen, and Colosse) showed various sulfate uptake and assimilation capacity in response to inefficient sulfate supply. Under inadequate sulfate conditions, a greater ATP sulfurylase activity in young leaves was observed in all cultivars compared to that of old leaves. In addition, GSH concentration was considerably increased in young leaves when S supply was declined from 2.0 to 0.2 mM. These results suggested that rape cultivars differ in their capacity to utilize sulfate under limited S conditions.
Ⅵ. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This study was supported by Technology Development Program for Agriculture and Forestry, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Republic of Korea.
Reference
2.Adams, C.A. and R.W. Rinne. 1969. Influence of age and sulphur metabolism on ATP sulfurylase activity in the soybean and a survey of selected species. Plant Physiol. 44:1241–1246.
3.Ahmad, A.I. Khan, N. A. Anjum, Y.P. Abrol and M. Iqbal. 2005. Role of sulphate transporter systems in sulphur efficiency of mustard genotypes. Plant Sci. 169:842–846.
4.Aulakh, M.S. 2003. Crop responses to sulphur nutrition. In: Y.P. Abrol, A. Ahmad (Eds.), Sulphur in Plants, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 341–354.
5.Bell, C.I., D.T. Clarkson and W.J. Cram. 1995. Sulfate supply and its regulation of transport in roots of a tropical legume Macroptilium atropurpureum cv. Siratro. J. Exp. Bot. 46:65–71.
6.Blake-Kalff, M.M.A., K.R. Harrison, M.J. Hawkesford, F.J. Zhao and S.P. McGrath. 1998. Distribution of sulfur within oilseed rape leaves in response to sulfur deficiency during vegetative growth. Plant Physiol. 118:1337–1344.
7.Clarkson, D.T., F.W. Smith and P.J. van den Berg. 1983. Regulation of sulfate transport in a tropical legume, Macroptilium atropurpureum, cv. Siratro. J. Exp. Bot. 34:1463–1483.
8.Eriksen, J., K. Thorup-Kristensen and M. Askegard. 2004. Plant availability of catch crop sulfur following spring incorporation. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 167:609–615.
9.Hartmann, T., P. Hönicke, M. Wirtz, R. Hell, H. Rennenberg and S. Kopriva. 2004. Sulfate assimilation in poplars (Populus tremula×P. alba) overexpressing γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase in the cytosol. J. Exp. Bot. 55:837–845.
10.Herschbach, C. and H. Rennenberg. 1991. Influence of glutathione (GSH) on sulfate influx, xylem loading and exudation in excised tobacco roots. J. Exp. Bot. 42:1021–1029.
11.Herschbach C., E. van Der Zalm, A. Schneider, L. Jouanin, L.J. De Kok, and H. Rennenberg. 2000. Regulation of sulfur nutrition in wild-type and transgenic poplar over-expressing γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase in the cytosol as affected by atmospheric H2S. Plant Physiol. 124:461–473.
12.Holmes, M.R.J. 1980. Nutrition of the Oilseed Rape Crop. Applied Science Publishers, London.
13.Kim, T.H., A. Ourry, J. Boucaud and G. Lemaire. 1991. Changes in source-sink relationship for nitrogen during regrowth of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) following removal of shoots. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 18:593–602.
14.Lappartient, A.G. and B. Touraine. 1996. Demand-driven control of root ATP Sulfurylase activity and SO42- uptake in Intact Canola. Plant Physiol. 111:147–157.
15.Lappartient, A.G., J.J. Vidmar, T. Leustek, A.D.M. Glass and B. Touraine. 1999. Inter-organ signaling in plants: regulation of ATP sulfurylase and sulfate transporter genes expression in roots mediated by phloem-translocated compound. Plant J. 18:89–95.
16.Legge, A.H. and S.V. Krupa. 2002. Effects of sulphur dioxide, in: Bell J.N.B., M. Treshow (Eds.), Air pollution and plant life, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 135–162.
17.Leustek, T. 2002. Sulfate metabolism. In CR Somerville, EM Meyerowitz, eds, The Arabidopsis Book. American Society of Plant Biologists, Rockville, MD, doi/10.1199/tab.0009.
18.Li, L.S., Y.L. Jin, B.R. Lee and T.H. Kim. 2009. Sulfur deficiency effects on sulfate uptake and assimilatory enzymes activity in rate plants. J. Kor. Grass. Forage Sci. 29(2)95–102.
19.Logan, H.M., N. Cathala, C. Grignon and J.C. Davidian. 1996. Cloning of a cDNA encoded by a member of the Arabidopsis thaliana ATP sulfurylase multigene family: expression studies in yeast and in relation to plant sulfur nutrition. J. Biol. Chem. 271:12227–12233.
20.Noctor, G., L. Gomez, H. Vanacker and C.H. Foyer. 2002. Interactions between biosynthesis, compartmentation and transport in the control of glutathione homeostasis and signaling. J. Exp. Bot. 53: 1283–1304.
21.Rennenberg, H. 1984. The fate of excess sulfur in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35:121–135.
22.Ruiz, J.M. and E. Blumwald. 2002. Salinity-induced glutathione synthesis in Brassica napus. Planta. 214, 965–969.
23.Saito, K. 2004. Sulfur assimilatory metabolism: the long and smelling road. Plant Physiol. 136:2443–2450.
24.Scherer, H.W. 2001. Sulphur in crop production. Eur. J. Agron. 14:81–111.
25.Smith, I.K. and A.L. Lang. 1988. Translocation of sulfate in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr). Plant Physiol. 86:798–802.
26.Tausz, M., J.H. Šircel and D. Grill. 2004. The glutathione system as stress marker in plant ecophysiology: is a stress-response concept valid? J. Exp. Bot. 55:1955–1962.
27.Zhao, F.J., P.J.A. Whiters, E.J. Evans, J. Monaghan, S.E. Salomon, P.R. Shewry and S.P. McGrath. 1997. Sulphur nutrition: An important factor for the quality of wheat and rapeseed. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 43:1137–114.